![]() it just has feeling for me of not sitting quite right with what I know of TM law. It appears in two places: AppleWebKit/537.36 and Safari/537.36. but if you do that as a company utilising someone else's trademark to do so. Website content owners can choose to cut out certain browsers if they wish, impersonating another browser is fine. You’ll also notice that the entire string ends with Edge/12. The trademark isn't needed in any technical way for IE to operate as it should, so it's not a compatibility issue. Neowin recently reported that Microsoft’s new browser for Windows 10, Spartan, uses the Chrome UA string, Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0 WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/.71 Safari/537.36 Edge/12.0. If, for example, people offer alternative services to people with an Apple UA string (BBC iPlayer did this) then you're impersonating such tech use via the trademark - it might be now for example that people need to turn off specific iPad enhancements as they break IE11 - that's commercial interference using a trademark. we have inspected your devices HTTP request headers, including the User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko compatible bingbot/2.0 + Chrome/1.134 Safari/537. ![]() For the web, native apps and mobile operator environments. When considering registered trademarks it's not necessary for confusion to be actually present at all - 100% of customers can know that your product isn't an iPad but if you advertise it as an iPad then you're infringing: it doesn't say "AppleWebKit compatible" in that string and the string is not required to make the browser function at all. KING-FM (98.1 MHz 'Classical King FM') is a non-commercial classical music radio station in Seattle, Washington owned by Classic Radio, a nonprofit organization. Mozilla/5.0 (X11 CrOS x8664 13982.82.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/.157 Safari/537.36 Bring device intelligence to your web applications in minutes. Confusion is the measure used when trademarks aren't registered and is much harder to prove.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |